Q&A with David Dockery
Corresponding with his new book, the following are some Q&A with David Dockery that he was gracious enough to give us for The Pathway:
Regarding contextualization, why does this topic seem like a brand-new issue on the domestic front of SBC work? Is it because the culture is post-Christian, thus necessitating the conversation about contextualization?
Answer: The issue of contextualization is a challenging topic. When contextualization is used to translate the message into a particular culture, it is a very good thing. When contextualization is misused, resulting in the transformation of the message so that the new word is not consistent with the apostolic message, then contextualization is quite problematic. Contextualization has been employed in mission contexts for many years. I think your observation about the seeming “newness” of its use in our culture has to do with he changes in our culture. I think it is the case that we now find ourselves in a post-Christian culture and thus communicating the good news of the gospel of Jesus Christ is more challenging than in years past. I try to offer some helpful suggestions regarding contextualization in the opening chapter on global missions, but I think that the discussion is quite applicable for us to consider in many contexts in this country. Perhaps, we need to think more creatively about combining the efforts of the IMB and NAMB in this regard.
How can pastors lead their people to appreciate and approve the diversity of the worship models you explain (i.e. liturgical, traditional/instructional, revivalistic, seeker-targeted/seeker-sensitive, praise & worship/ blended, emerging/emergent) “without implicitly giving assent to the individualistic church-shopping mentality already so prevalent in our religious culture?
In the chapter on worship, I do not intend to “bless” the consumer mindset that is so prominent among us. I do think it is important, however, to recognize the diverse worship practices among Southern Baptists. Regardless of approach, I trust that the suggestions about ways to seek renewal in our worship can be applied across the board in the various settings. What is needed most of all is a different way of thinking about worship, which will lead to a God-centered approach to worship. In turn, I pray that this will lead to a God-centered way of thinking about life and our place in the world.
Since so many historic Baptist universities now no longer have any relationship to Baptists, how important is it for Baptist State Conventions to take seriously the responsibility to keep institutions within confessional boundaries?
The responsibility for the integrity of Baptist institutions ultimately rests with the Board of Trustees at each institution. Helping trustees understand the heritage, identity, mission, and commitments of an institution is a priority. This can often be quite challenging. Board members have to work with the administration to provide careful orientation for trustees as they are elected to these key positions of service.
You advocate a SBC renewal of both conviction and cooperation. It seems as though the individual Christian can take personal responsibility to maintain biblical conviction, but when it comes to cooperation, it takes two to dance. So, within the denomination, what is a game plan for seeking “renewal in cooperation” when one finds “Bridge-Building” to be a song few others want to sing?
When we understand the importance of cooperation for advancing our shared work as a convention, it can create a new excitement among people to see the amazing things that can be done together in the areas of missions, education, benevolence, and culture-engaging ministries. Cooperation that leads to collaboration is a very good thing. Sometimes those who emphasize conviction can become quite cantankerous. On the other hand, cooperation slides into compromise. When that happens, we are left with two undesirable choices, either a non-cooperating cantankerousness or compromise. I think the call must be for us all to understand afresh the synergy that can be created by cooperating together in collaborative efforts to bring about the Great Commission Resurgence that so many of us pray for on a regular basis.
So much of what you advocate is predicated on SBC folks - members and ministers alike - being regenerate and submitting to the Lordship of Christ and being filled and led by the Holy Spirit. In other words - real Christianity must abound in our convention. Would you say that what we really hope for then is both reformation and revival, a work of God in our midst? If so, what historical precedents would you have us meditate on, in thinking of what God has done in the past and may do in the future?
Yes, we need to pray for genuine renewal, which is indeed a work of God. The title of the book is a call for both consensus and renewal. It is possible to have consensus without renewal, but I do not think we can have genuine renewal that does not lead to a blessed consensus in our understanding of our confessional heritage and our calling to serve and work together in cooperation. Most of us have only known a cultural or programmatic consensus over the past 60 or so years in the SBC. My prayer is for a genuine confessional or theological consensus that is brought about by a God-given and God-blessed spiritual renewal. My hope is that God will enhance our understanding and commitments to the Gospel, to Scripture, and to our Baptist confessional heritage, while bringing about renewal in our worship and shared service as we seek to take the good news of Jesus Christ to a lost and needy world. If this book can be used in any way as a first step for us in these areas, I will be grateful and will give thanks to our great God.
